new jersey v tlo

Was charged with possession of marijuana. A New Jersey high school student was accused of violating school rules by smoking in the restroom leading an assistant principal to search her purse for cigarettes.

Pin On Civics Education

J discovered two girls smoking in a lavatory.

. Moved to suppress evidence discovered in the search but the Court denied her motion. TLO holding that public school administrators can search a students belongings if they have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. On January 15 1985 the US. The Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of New Jersey Middlesex County found her guilty and sentenced her to probation for one year.

Was decided in 1985 it still has an impact on every student who brings a purse or backpack to school. A New Jersey high school student was accused of violating school rules by smoking in the bathroom leading an assistant principal to search her purse for cigarettes. And 3 whether the exclusionary rule bars the use in a criminal proceeding of evidence that a school. In sum the reasonableness standard in TLO without the need for probable cause is a lower standard that makes students more susceptible to searches by school officials.

325 1985 New Jersey v. Register here Brief Fact Summary. The vice principal discovered marijuana and other items that implicated the student in dealing marijuana. So many students were caught with aspirin and Midol at school and now understand why the schools reacted the way they did.

Decided January 15 1985. 2 on the facts of this case did the school official violate that standard. I On March 7 1980 a teacher at Piscataway High School in Middlesex County N. Synopsis of Rule of Law.

Reargued October 2 1984. The vice principal discovered marijuana and other items that implicated the student in dealing marijuana which was illegal. New Jersey v. New Jersey v.

Argued March 28 1984. 1 what is the proper standard for judging the reasonableness of a school officials search of a students purse. On appeal the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the. The State of New Jersey was the plaintiff of the case TLO the acronym given to the high school student who was classified as a.

One of the two girls was the respondent T. About New Jersey v. On appeal the Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division. Moved to suppress evidence discovered in the search but the Court denied her motion.

The Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of New Jersey Middlesex County found her guilty and sentenced her to probation for one year. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Syllabus. O Download PDF Check Treatment Summary holding that the Fourth Amendment applies to searches and seizures conducted by public-school officials establishing the standard for finding a violation but concluding that the claim at issue failed Summary of this case from Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Supreme Court ruled in New Jersey v.

Is important because it delineates a departure from standard Fourth Amendment search and seizure jurisprudence. Posted by Melanie Lee on Nov 19th 2020 This was one of their favorite assignments we completed. This extended the conversation to searching cell-phones. 325 1985 Argued March 28 1984 Reargued October 2 1984 Decided January 15 1985 JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Although New Jersey v. In its decision in this case the New Jersey Supreme Court addressed three distinct questions. The vice-principal of a school searched a students bag and found evidence that she was dealing marijuana. The student tried to have the evidence from her purse suppressed.

This case explores the legal concept of search and seizure. Dont know your Bloomberg Law login. The landmark case involved a high school girl who because she was a juvenile at the time was referred to in court and in court records by her initials TLO. Was charged with possession of marijuana.

2d 720 1985 Powered by Law Students.